Microdurability Conference, Amsterdam 2012

Results obtained on the course of tM3C4's research were presented and published in the latest Microstructural-related Durability of Cementitious Composites in Amsterdam. Interesting discussion with colleagues and friends ended up in fruitful feedback for the project. More about M3C4's research is going to be published in SSCS 2012 in Aix-en-Provence, France and ICCRRR 2012 in Cape Town, South Africa.
Until soon!

Corrosion induced crack patterns are influenced by many things. Rebar diameter, spacing, cover depth, and boundary conditions all play a role. In the videos, two different scenarios are compared: both specimens have 2 rebars of 10mm diameter, but one has a cover depth of 10 mm, while the other one has a cover depth of 20 mm. Crack growth in both specimens is shown. The difference is obvious.

However, in reality, corrosion rarely causes uniform expansion of the reinforcing steel. Therefore, it is possible that real pressure on the surrounding concrete acts in a different way (Ohtsu and Uddin, "Mechanisms of corrosion-induced cracks in concrete at meso- and macro-scales", Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology Vol.6 , No. 3, 419-429, October 2008):

The effect of different scenarios on the crack patterns in our model is visible in the following snapshots (at 5000 steps- yellow for visibility):

(top to bottom- radial, horizontal and vertical loading scheme, respectively)

It is clear that the loading condition makes a difference in the cracking behavior of the cover. Hope everyone is convinced! Enjoy the holidays!

When the reinforcing steel bar inside concrete corrodes, it starts expanding, since the volume of the oxides that form during the process is higher than the volume of the original steel. It, therefore, exerts pressure on the surrounding concrete, which eventually cracks. To study the mechanism, the lattice model can be used. Here is the result of the first simulation of corrosion induced cracking. Enjoy!

The "rebar effect"

It has been reported in the literature that the buildup of chloride ions occurs at the top of the rebar. This means that the higher chloride concentration can be observed at the top of the reinforcing steel, than at the same depth to the side. Since reinforcement is impermeable to chloride ions, this actually makes perfect sense. Therefore, sampling the chloride ions at the side of the rebar to study, for example, the chloride threshold concentration, can lead to serious errors. This has be proven experimentally by Yu et al. (2007) in their study. So, what is a simple way to check this hypothesis? Well, numerical simulation, of course!

First figure shows the setup. Part of the mesh was was made impermeable to simulate the effect of reinforcing steel, while the chloride can freely penetrate the other side of the sample. The specimen was then subjected to chloride penetration for a certain period.


And here is the result:

Clearly, the phenomenon does occur. And what are the implications for the Round Robin test of the CTC Rilem committee? I guess we'll just have to wait and see!

Reference: H. Yu, W.H. Hartt, Y.P. Virmani, "Effects of reinforcement and coarse aggregates on chloride ingress into concrete and time-to-corrosion: Part 1-Spatial Chloride Distribution and Implications", NACE Corrosion 2007 Conference & Expo

Chloride exposure of cracked concrete

Concrete specimens with controlled crack widths just started to be exposed to a chloride containing solution. This experiment will show how fast chlorides penetrate into concrete on the vicinity of the crack.
More results to be posted soon.

Photo by: B. Šavija

Chloride binding

As chlorides penetrate into the concrete, some of them are physically and chemically bound to the cement matrix. Therefore, only free chloride ions can promote the further penetration. Also, only free chloride ions are responsible for steel depassivation and initiation of the reinforcement corrosion. This effect needs, therefore, to be included in our predictions. The simplest way to do this is to consider binding as a linear phenomenon. Some authors suggested, however, that this assumption is not suitable for a wide range of chloride concentrations. Therefore, non-linear binding isotherms (mainly Freundlich and Langmuir) are often used. First trials with the both nonlinear and linear binding have been performed, and here are the results!

ESEM

Some interesting results were obtained on the ESEM on the past days. There is still a group of samples to be analyzed this week and results seem promising! Part of this work will be published soon. Keep in touch for more upcoming updates.
Adios

Click here to download the January 2012 Newsletter

January has come to an end. Now the M3C4 project is proud to announce the first monthly issue of the Newsletter. On January, some interesting results were found. More information regarding publications or presentations at Conferences will be published soon!

See ya,

Glowing concrete

It seems that concrete properties also include glowing under UV light! Cracks allow aggressive substances to reach into concrete. In this case, the crack pattern is visible when it has been filled with epoxy.


We would like to take this opportunity to wish you success in all your endeavors. Until next time!

Photo by: J. Pacheco

In 2011, it seems that the one question that was on everybody's mind was: is self-healing of concrete possible? Even though it is not directly related to our project, we've been asking ourselves the same thing. Here is our suggestion:

And with that, the M3C4 team would like to wish everyone Marry Christmas and a happy New Year! Till next year!